In statistics and probability, he calls a normal or Gaussian distribution to one of the continuous variable probability distributions that most frequently appears in statistics and probability theory. When it comes to hardware failure, this Gaussian distribution (represented by the well-known Gaussian Bell) perfectly explains the device failure statistics, but why does new hardware tend to fail more?
Statistics Explain Why New Hardware May Fail
When you buy a new piece of hardware, be it a graphics card, a processor, or a peripheral like a mouse, the device failing when it’s new is exactly as likely to fail when it’s old, whereas it is quite rare as once. you have the component already installed and that has been running for a few days, fail.
Obviously it is not to anyone’s taste that a new component gives you problems, but there are several factors that explain this, starting with the failures in the manufacturing process. Imagine, for example, that a graphics card has had a manufacturing problem and some GPU pins have not been soldered correctly: when you connect it to your PC it will not work, or it will fail shortly after it is working. However, if you buy a GPU, install it on your PC and have already been running it for a month without problems, it is quite unlikely that it will fail you until it reaches the end of its useful life, and this is explained by the graph of the Gaussian bell that we have told you about before.
According to this statistical function, when the hardware is new or when it has already reached the end of its life cycle is when it is most likely to fail, in the first case almost always due to manufacturing problems or because it has suffered some external damage, and in the second case, because the components have already reached the end of their useful life.
However, in the middle of its life cycle the probability of failure is extremely low, and proof of this is that it is quite rare that, for example, a graphics card that has already been working for a year will fail (except for external factors) until that is already quite old and has a lot of use. This is the reason why new hardware is much more likely to fail than a component that has already been running for a few months without problem, no more and no less, and the funny thing is that this statistic tells us that the probability that it will fail being new it is the same as when it has reached the end of its life cycle.
The warranty policy and planned obsolescence
Manufacturers are perfectly aware of the life cycle of their products, and although new hardware is more likely to fail than hardware that has been in use for a while, the law requires them to give their products a warranty period for if they are wrong from the factory. Generally, the warranty period for your products goes right up to the top of the Gaussian Bell curve, and therefore when the probability of failure begins to increase.
Obviously manufacturers are not stupid and they know exactly how long the useful life of their product reaches, so it is quite normal for devices to start to fail just when the warranty period is over. Chance? Planned obsolescence? None of that: if a manufacturer gives its power supply a warranty period of, for example, 5 years, it is because it knows that its life cycle is 10, but from the 5th year it is when the bell curve begins to fall. and therefore the probabilities of failure begin to increase.